Search
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please try to register or login.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
SteRT  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:34:51 PM(UTC)
SteRT

Rank: Loader

Posts: 1

I was just looking at the preview cards and was struck by the difference in Damage Capacity between the US Shermans (6) and the British Firefly (5) and Sherman V (4).

Why the disparity given that they are essentially the same tank?
actionmackie  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:44:35 PM(UTC)
actionmackie

Rank: Commander

Posts: 102

Thanks: 19 times
Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Started watching lots of videos to educate myself on tanks of WW2, there were some differences in the tanks, they were changed slightly to fit British tank practises, for example they removed the anti air 50 Cal as they felt it was superfluous but think they were all minor modifications. Maybe those damn yanks sold us tanks made of monkey metal.
FMC  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, March 22, 2016 9:38:01 PM(UTC)
FMC

Rank: Loader

Posts: 3

Dry ammo racks versus wet ones?

Shot traps on the front glacis?

Less confidence in the tank from the crew?
Carlson793  
#4 Posted : Friday, March 25, 2016 11:41:40 AM(UTC)
Carlson793

Rank: Commander

Posts: 236

Thanks: 18 times
Was thanked: 65 time(s) in 52 post(s)
Originally Posted by: actionmackie Go to Quoted Post
Maybe those damn yanks sold us tanks made of monkey metal.

Not monkey metal - we made 'em from all that tea left over from our Boston Harbour party 160+ years earlier. ;D
actionmackie  
#5 Posted : Friday, March 25, 2016 12:13:00 PM(UTC)
actionmackie

Rank: Commander

Posts: 102

Thanks: 19 times
Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Carlson793 Go to Quoted Post

Not monkey metal - we made 'em from all that tea left over from our Boston Harbour party 160+ years earlier. ;D


And thus the term brew up was born lol

thanks 1 user thanked actionmackie for this useful post.
Carlson793 on 3/25/2016(UTC)
Acebuckeye13  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, March 30, 2016 6:47:28 AM(UTC)
Acebuckeye13

Rank: Loader

Posts: 3

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
The American Sherman appears to be a late M4A3 model. These typically had "Wet" ammunition stowage and a thicker, solid glacis plate. The British Shermans are from BF's M4A4 kit, which had dry stowage and marginally thinner frontal armor. So it makes sense for the American Sherman to be more damage resistant than the British version, though less so for the Firefly to magically have more resilience than the baseline tank.
thanks 1 user thanked Acebuckeye13 for this useful post.
actionmackie on 3/30/2016(UTC)
Andrew at Tanks HQ  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, March 30, 2016 1:42:18 PM(UTC)
Andrew at Tanks HQ

Rank: HQ

Posts: 94

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 72 time(s) in 45 post(s)
There is more then just Armour that dictates a tank's Hull points. In the Case of the Firefly it has one more point due to the fact that its Ammo is better protected then the standard British Sherman I tank.

Edited by user Wednesday, March 30, 2016 1:46:43 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error