Search
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please try to register or login.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
barca  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:53:32 AM(UTC)
barca

Rank: Gunner

Posts: 12

These two statements appear to contradict each other:
On p. 8: "Tanks completely within a Wood, and anything they shoot at, are in Cover.”

On p. 12: "Ignore terrain directly underneath the shooting tank (not the whole terrain piece) when determining if the target is in Cover.”

Which of these would state it better?
If either the shooter or its target is in woods, the target gets the benefit of cover.

If the target is in cover, within or at the edge of woods, they get the benefit of cover.
Sean at TANKS HQ  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:16:15 AM(UTC)
Sean at TANKS HQ

Rank: Commander

Posts: 161

Thanks: 74 times
Was thanked: 149 time(s) in 83 post(s)
The second rule allows tanks to poke their front out of a wood in order to have cover, but not grant it to their target.
thanks 1 user thanked Sean at TANKS HQ for this useful post.
WolfBenrath on 6/28/2016(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error