Looking at the cards in the store all of them apart from one have all the key words for the tank on the key words line apart from the IS-2 which does not have Heavy Tank. Is this an oversight?

Actually, this is somewhat off-topic, but since the cards we've seen are previews, does that mean the current stats aren't yet set in stone? For the most part things seem to make sense, but there's a few things I've noticed (Such as Pershings and Sherman 76s having the same firepower) that make me a bit concerned about the final product.

Also, somewhat more relavant to the discussion at hand, I wanted to ask about the Heavy Tank rule-what was the reasoning that went into it? Considering the traditional tactic of dealing with heavy tanks in most games (As well as historically) has been to get around them and make flanking shots, it seems odd that the Heavy Tank rule specifically removes this as a viable tactic.

It seems a bit odd to me even having "Heavy Tank" it dosen't have "Big Gun" with that 122mm and has 2 Def comparing it with the 3 of the super pershing or the 2 of the phanhter. its fine if its the early model, but the 1944 version should have 3 of defense with that logic.

Yup, why does the Heavy Tank rule disregard the bonus for a flank attack? Pretty much all tanks had less armour on the sides, and almost certain that all heavy tanks had significantly less side armour. This really does need to change.