Tanks
»
Tanks
»
Rules Discussion
»
abilities stacking question
Rank: Gunner
Posts: 15
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 3 post(s)
|
Hey guys! been playing Tanks for about 2 weeks now and I must say i am really addicted to this game. Its great fun.
I have 2 quick questions which Id love to have have help with before I play my next game.
Can upgrade cards increasing a veicles particular ability stack?
to be specific,
If i have an engine card which gives my vehicle a +1 movement initiative and then a commander who also provides a +2 movement initiative, would that total to a +3 added onto my vehicles basic stat?
and I have another card which states:
"lose the fast keyword" to gain +1 wound
now, if my vehicle does not have the fast keyword (which i think gives the vehicles an extra movement?) can he benefit from the +1 wound.
or can that card only be placed on a specific vehicle with the Fast keyword?
thanks so much for your help!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: HQ
Posts: 94
Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 72 time(s) in 45 post(s)
|
Question 1, Yes Abilities stack, so you would get +3 initiative.
Question 2, you can add this to any tank, if you happen to have fast you lose it.
|
 1 user thanked Andrew at Tanks HQ for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - Yes they Stack.
2 - No. It says ""lose the fast keyword" to gain +1 wound. So you have to have it, in order to give it up in exchange for the +1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Commander
Posts: 99
Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 9 post(s)
|
The guy from gf9 already said yes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Gunner
Posts: 15
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 3 post(s)
|
Thanks very much for the reply.we had been playing it that way but I just wanted clarification in case there were any problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So you can just play the card for +1 wound whether or not you have Fast? ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: HQ
Posts: 94
Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 72 time(s) in 45 post(s)
|
Yep the loss of FAST is a side effect of putting extra armour on the tank, not a cost.
|
1 user thanked Andrew at Tanks HQ for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Gunner
Posts: 15
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 3 post(s)
|
Think we can mark this topic as closed admins. My question has been answered :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It could probably be worded better then.
"lose the fast keyword to gain +1 wound" implies its a condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Commander
Posts: 161
Thanks: 74 times
Was thanked: 149 time(s) in 83 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Tattoosavage  It could probably be worded better then.
"lose the fast keyword to gain +1 wound" implies its a condition.
That was a paraphrase, the actual card reads: Loses the Fast keyword.
+1 hull. The two effects of this card aren't linked.
|
1 user thanked Sean at TANKS HQ for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by: Sean at TANKS HQ Originally Posted by: Tattoosavage It could probably be worded better then.
"lose the fast keyword to gain +1 wound" implies its a condition.
That was a paraphrase, the actual card reads: Loses the Fast keyword.
+1 hull. The two effects of this card aren't linked. Ah ! righto. I was going by what the opener asked. Yes in that case it makes sense lol. Thanks Sean !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanks
»
Tanks
»
Rules Discussion
»
abilities stacking question
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.