Originally Posted by: actionmackie
If the vehicle is fully hidden behind an obstacle then no line of sight exists.
What does this mean for Assault Guns, well smart use of terrain can be used to shield the Gun from enemy tanks, forcing them to come round in front of the barrel
I've not explained well what I meant to say.. I take a step back.
Let's change scenario.
You're in a tank, and you line up your gun on an enemy formation. They're all advancing in line, in open ground, costant speed. Through your scope you see a Pz IV, then a Panther, then a Tiger, and then a Stug. Who's the easiest target (to hit, we're not talking about penetration)?
Of course NOT the StuG. The lil'bastard is so low, it's so much easier to hit a big target like a Tiger or a Panther! (and try to think about a Hetzer and a King Tiger!)
Say, now, that those guys spot you, and they put themselves hull down (which, like in reality, means that they put themselves in a position from where they can fire to the enemy while presenting the smallest target possible), the StuG will be an almost impossible target, leaving out just the gun mantlet and the gunner's iposcopes! The others will present to your sights just the turret, a small but not impossible target.
So, returning to our game, a hedgerow can hide my StuG & my Panther, but the first one won't be able to fire, while the other will be, from a hull down position, and therefore in cover, but this is just a logical assumption, because if you follow the rules, Panther's 4 corners are hidden just like the StuG's ones, so no LOS for both of them.
This applies also on an open but uneven ground, where a StuG can result "hull down" for an enemy simply because the terrain is a bit lower in that spot.
These situations should be possible in the game, but the rules now prevent this smart and efficient way of terrain exploitation.
I think this is a major problem, and to me is a thing to fix ASAP :)
Edited by user Friday, April 1, 2016 5:04:41 AM(UTC)
| Reason: grammar